­

Sixty years ago, scientists were on the cusp of a revolutionary scientific breakthrough. In the preceding decades, researchers had had some success transplanting organs in animals, and there had even been a few failed attempts at human organ transplants.  Numerous studies showed that human organ transplantation was feasible, and that it would be enormously beneficial to thousands of patients, but nobody had been able to make it work.

Success finally came in the early 1950s, when several kidney  transplants within a few years gave new life to ailing patients. In the following decades, doctors learned how to transplant other organs successfully, and they dramatically improved recovery rates.

Today, most organ transplants are relatively safe, routine procedures, and transplantation is considered to be the best treatment option for thousands of patients every year.

Unfortunately, doctors and patients now face a new obstacle:  Around the world thousands of people are on waiting lists  for a life-saving or life-improving transplant.

Sadly, people die waiting for the gift of a heart, liver, kidney, lung or pancreas transplant.    The demand for transplants has far surpassed the supply of donated organs.   Simply put, there aren’t enough organ donors, so patients must wait months, even years, for their chance at recovery.

For many others, the wait means long weeks or months in hospital or several trips to hospital every week for treatment such as dialysis. For some, it means being attached to an oxygen tank 24 hours a day. One organ and tissue donor can save or enhance the lives of 10 people or more.

Kidneys and livers may be transplanted from a living donor, since people are born with an extra kidney and the liver is regenerative.

Even a lung can be transplanted from a living donor, but this is still very rare. For these procedures, a patient will generally find a willing donor in a friend or family member.    If the donor is a match, they can proceed directly to the surgery stage. A smaller number of living transplants come from charitable people donating for the general good.

­If a patient needs a heart transplant, a double lung transplant, a pancreas transplant or a cornea transplant, they will need to get it from a cadaverous (deceased) donor. Generally, acceptable donors are people who are brain dead but on artificial life support.

Even though they are technically dead, their body is still functioning, which means the organs remain healthy. Organs will deteriorate very quickly after the body itself expires, making them unusable for transplant.

There is a never-ending challenge to continue to find more donors and help those on the waiting list.

Transplantation has dramatically improved the lives of recipients and enabled them to be active, healthy members of the community.

There are significant cost benefits to transplants when compared with the on-going cost of treatment for people requiring transplants.

The bad news – many people with disabilities still face discrimination in terms of referral and evaluation for transplantation, and actually receiving a transplant once referred.

There is a very great deal we do not know about the experience of people with disabilities in terms of organ transplants. The National Working Group’s survey gives a first glimpse at how things have improved, but also how many barriers there are.

Myths and Truths

Myths and misconceptions about organ donation discourage potential donors from making the decision to donate organs or tissue after death.

We have many misconceptions, mainly because death is not something most people want to think about while we are alive, regardless of what condition we are in, we have an inbuilt desire to survive – part of every  mammal on earth’s maternal instinct, which is our “fight and flight” senses that pump up our adrenaline in readiness to help us survive.

However, there is another question that has never been addressed before when a person is waiting for a compatible donor.   What about the DNA of the organ they will be receiving ??  

The following report is one to consider of great importance, especially if the organs have come from suspicious origins.  In other words, the  “black market of organs”  that seems readily available, or organs that have been bought cheaply from very poor societies, whereby the organ donor will continue living in hardship conditions, but their organ has been transplanted into another body. Those organs are still receptive to the body it came from through its DNA.

Or, the donor was not a willing donor, and died fighting for his freedom from his captives and for dear life itself; the organs would be completely stressed and more than likely would not co-operate well with the new recipient.

READ THIS IT’S TRUE.

Dr Backster totally shocked the scientific world. He scraped human cells from a volunteer’s mouth and connected these to his polygraph and medical EEG equipment. He found to his utter amazement that these cells reacted instantaneously to the donor’s emotions, even when they were geographically separated!  White blood cells were found to be particularly susceptible to emotion.

So what happens if you have received an organ from someone who is living in distress after giving up their organ, either willingly or not, does that organ still feel the suffering of its donor and carry that through to the new recipient ?   Is that why some organs reject ?

If you understand the true effect we all have i.e. ‘Butterfly Effect’, ‘The One Hundredth Monkey’ and natural skills like telepathy, read below for some interesting news.

This concept of intelligence existing “outside” the physical confines of the living organism has been hard for the scientific community to accept.   But over the past 5-10 years, hard evidence has been produced which is having its effect on the scientific skeptics.

Dr. Karl Pribram, a prominent American brain surgeon, sees the brains neurons “out picturing” the physical universe, similar to the holographic process. He suggests that our brains are exposed to the entire concept of the universe in the same way that any minute part of a hologram contains basically the same information as the whole.

British scientist, Jacob Boehm came up with the same Holographic Theory and had it published in a prominent scientific journal. But probably most amazing of all is the theory that British physicist Rupert Sheldrake has proffered.   If his theory is proven correct, it will rival Charles Darwin’s Theory of evolution in its magnitude.

Basically he has proven repeatedly through laboratory controlled experiments that different species of animals appear to be “plugged” into a dedicated intelligence field which is universal to that particular species.

For example, when enough mice in a group have learned a maze, they ALL suddenly know the maze – whether they have run it or not! It now appears, after a BBC television experiment, that if enough humans have learned something, then it becomes easier for all humans to learn it. Sheldrake calls this shared intelligence the morphogenetic field.

There is an interesting parable about his called the “100th monkey” relating to an apparent observation made on a remote Japanese Island. A very bright female monkey on a small island was taught to wash sweet potatoes in the seawater.   She then taught other members of the tribe to do this.

When approximately 100 monkeys had learned this procedure, many other remote monkey tribes started washing potatoes in the same manner.   But the interesting thing is that these other tribes were situated on other remote islands and also on the mainland. That is, they had no possible way of acquiring this knowledge, other by some form of intuitive universal “sharing”.

The BBC in London tried out Sheldrake’s Theory on 8 million of their viewers.     They showed on prime time TV, a difficult puzzle that only a very small percentage of their viewers were able to solve.

Then the correct answer was also given on prime time TV. Shortly after, the same experiment was repeated by a TV network in another country.

A far higher percentage of these foreign viewers were able to get the puzzle right the first time.   As the puzzle was in the form of a universal pictorial concept, language and customs were not considered to be a factor.

The BBC and Sheldrake concluded that as the correct answer was now existing within the human morphogenetic field then the human race now “knows” the answer. Basically Sheldrake’s Theory explains “intuitive” functioning to a degree.

What Sheldrake is saying is that there is a “larger” mind for each life-form and each individual life-form “programs” that larger mind. The theory might be laughable except for Sheldrake’s acceptance in the scientific community and also the BBC experiment.

But probably the most startling (and easily repeatable) experiments came from Cleve Backster, a polygraph (lie detector) expert. Operating from his San Diego, Californian laboratory he found that plants react – at a distance – to human thought.

He initially connected his polygraph equipment to a Dragon Plant to test for possible “plant stress”. He decided to generate stress by burning the plants leaves and sure enough the polygraph machine registered a strong reaction. But he hadn’t actually burnt the leaves – he had only intended to do so!   He had thought about it with emotion and intent!

Skeptics who tried the same experiment without genuine intent couldn’t get it to work.

Dr Backster went a step further and totally shocked the scientific world. He scraped human cells from a volunteer’s mouth and connected these to his polygraph and medical EEG equipment.

He found to his utter amazement that these cells reacted instantaneously to the donor’s emotions, even when they were geographically separated! White blood cells were found to be particularly susceptible to emotion. (This may explain for the first time why people with strong positive emotions have better health).

This intelligence field is the key to probably the most extraordinary part of the advanced mind power research of Jim Francis – his discoveries about our mental connection with the morphogenetic field. And could explain how his exciting programs work, such as Subjective Communication – the ability to connect with other peoples minds through this field to create win/win situations… …and remote viewing, the ability to see people, objects and places in the past, present and future – by accessing this field… …and remote influencing, the ability to transfer emotions and heal people from a distance, through this field.

Incidentally, Dr Arikian has had some amazing results, and has in the past restored many People with diseased or damaged body parts, considered unfix-able, without surgery or the use of anything invasive.